Criminal Defence Cases Recently Defended by Michael R. Shapray

1999 - 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007

R. v. A.C. [2005]
Charges of Sexual Assault dropped by prosecutor mid-trial after successful cross-examination of main complainant.

R. v. I.M. [2005]
Conditional sentence granted to client who pleaded guilty to stealing from his religious congregation over course of a year resulting in no time spent in jail.

R. v. T. S. [2005]
Client under investigation for sexual assault - challenge to police evidence - Police File Closed - NO CRIMINAL CHARGES.

R. v. R.H. [2005]
Charges of impaired driving and over 80 withdrawn by prosecutor in middle of trial after strenuous cross-examination of primary police officer in the case.

R. v. G.S. [2005]
Charge of impaired driving and over 80 withdrawn after issues of police suppression of material evidence raised during trial. 

R. v. K.L. [2005]
Successful challenge to 90-day Administrative Driving Prohibition for over .08 charge.

R. v. N.H. [2005]
Marijuana grow operation case withdrawn by prosecutor after challenge to police investigation.

R. v. O.H. [2005]
Charge of breach of probation dropped by prosecutor after legal issues raised prior to trial.

R. v. E.S. [2005]
Successful challenge to 90-day Administrative Driving Prohibition for over .08 charge.

R. v. N.P. [2005]
Cocaine possession charges dropped after submissions to federal prosecutor concerning strength of the case and background of the accused.

R. v. D.P. [2005]
Charges of impaired driving and refuse breath sample dropped in the middle of trial after police officers caught talking about evidence outside the courtroom in breach of court order. 

R. v. L.C. [2005]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.

R. v. L.R. [2005]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.

R. v. R.P. [2005]
Charges of breach of probation withdrawn before trial after extensive submissions to prosecutor.

R. v. B.S. [2005]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.

R. v. R.R. [2005]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.

R. v. L. M. [2005]
Charge of impaired driving and over 80 withdrawn after successful challenge to police evidence.

R. v. P.D. [2005]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 dropped before trial after successful fight against Crown application to adjourn trial results in no witnesses being available for the prosecution.

R. v. D.H. [2005]
Charges of mischief and drug possession dropped after challenge to police evidence.  Client approved for diversion out of the criminal justice system.

R. v. S.G. [2005]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police investigative methods in case involving seizure of blood samples and hospital records to prove blood alcohol readings.

R. v. D.F. [2005]
Successful challenge to police evidence in impaired driving case resulting in plea to Motor Vehicle Act charge with No Criminal Record.

R. v. F.N. [2005]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.

R. v. K.C. [2005]
New trial ordered by Court of Appeal in drug trafficking case.


R. v. R.H. [2005]
Client granted conditional discharge for offence involving internal theft from employer resulting in no criminal record.


R. v. E.M. [2005]
Successful challenge to 90-day Administrative Driving Prohibition for over .08 charge.


R. v. A.P. [2005]
Application for access to Search Warrant documents in complex criminal investigation across Canada.


R. v. R.L. [2005]
Charge of impaired driving and over 80 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.