R. v. D.Z. [2011]
Charges of Driving While Prohibited reduced through Mr. Shapray's negotiation with prosecutor - client entered plea to charge of failing to produce a driver's license which does not have a minimum 1 year driving prohibition.
R. v. S.D. [2010]
Charge of Driving While Prohibited DROPPED on morning of trial after challenge to documentary evidence - prosecutor convinced that available evidence did not support allegation that driver was driving while prohibited.
R. v. B.R. [2010]
Client received CONDITIONAL SENTENCE in case involving charges of gun possession and break and enter. Investigation involved wiretap and extensive police investigation. Prosecutor was seeking at least 2 years in real jail at contested sentencing hearing - client permitted to serve sentence at home.
R. v. H.D. [2010]
Client found NOT GUILTY of charge of driving without due care and attention under s. 144 of the Motor Vehicle Act. Challenge to evidence of Identification and nature of the driving evidence being alleged.
R. v. H.K. [2009]
Charges of Drive While Prohibited reduced to plea to Driving without a License under the Motor Vehicle Act.
R. v. D.W. [2009]
Speeding charges withdrawn on trial date for want of prosecution.
R. v. J.L. [2009]
Charge of Drive While Prohibited resolved mid-trial with plea to Driving without a Driver's License resulting in no minimum 1 year driving prohibition.
R. v. L.R. [2009]
Speeding charges dismissed at trial.
R. v. M.C. [2009]
Two charges of Driving While Prohibited withdrawn by prosecutor prior to trial after challenge to police evidence - No Driving Prohibition.
R. v. K.V. [2008]
Charges of Drive While Prohibited dropped when prosecutor could not produce evidence of driving and knowledge of prohibition.
R. v. I.B [2008]
Charge of Drive without Due Care and Attention withdrawn at trial due to lack of evidence.
R. v. M.S. [2007]
Charges of Drive While Prohibited reduced to Driving Without License thereby avoiding minimum 1 year driving prohibition.
