R. v. B.C. [2012]
Charges of Impaired Driving and Over "80" DROPPED by prosecutor prior to trial after Mr. Shapray's submissions regarding unreasonable delay and trial not being held within a reasonable time - NO CRIMINAL RECORD and NO DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. M.F. [2012]
DUI charges reduced from Criminal charges to Motor Vehicle Act charges (s.144) on morning of trial after negotiations with prosecutor and issues raised with lack of court time leading to possible issues regarding trial within a reasonable time - NO CRIMINAL RECORD.
Impaired Driving and Over 80 charges dismissed mid-trial after challenge to police evidence and issue raised with respect to documentation from breath machine not being an original document.
R. v. O.H. [2011]
DUI charge thrown out by Judge after Mr. Shapray's application to stay the proceedings as a result of a breach of the client's right to be tried within a reasonable time under the Charter. Judge finds that defence was not responsible for any of the delay and that the guidelines set out by the Supreme Court of Canada for an impaired driving trial had been exceeded.
R. v. T.H. [2011]
DUI charged DROPPED after diligent disclosure inquiries by Mr. Shapray lead to discovery of improper communications between prosecutor and investigating police officer.
R. v. B.W. [2011]
Impaired driving and Over "80" charges DROPPED after issues raised regarding the inability of the Court to provide dates for a trial within a reasonable time.
R. v. K.M. [2011]
Charge of refusing to comply with a breath demand DROPPED BY CROWN mid-trial after attack on the training of the Breathalyzer technician's qualifications and lack of knowledge regarding the no volume key on the instrument.
R. v. S.B. [2011]
Impaired Driving charges involving accident resolved on morning of trial as a result of challenge to evidence concerning identity of driver and discovery of missing disclosure by Mr. Shapray - No Criminal Record
R. v. B.G. [2011]
Delay issues raised in DUI charges - negotiation with Crown led to plea pursuant to s. 144 under the Motor Vehicle Act. After contested submissions to the Judge on appropriate sentence, client received NO DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. C.A. [2011]
Impaired Driving charges resolved by way of plea to s. 144 of the Motor Vehicle Act after challenge to aspects of police evidence and issue regarding availability of court time - NO CRIMINAL RECORD and NO DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. N.G. [2011]
DUI charges dropped for plea to Motor Vehicle Act charge after issues raised regarding unreasonable delay - NO CRIMINAL RECORD.
R. v. S.M. [2011]
Mid-trial resolution of Impaired Driving and Driving Over 80 charges after challenge to quality of police evidence - plea to s. 144 of the Motor Vehicle Act.
R. v. D.P. [2011]
Charges of Impaired Driving and Over 80 resolved with plea to s. 144 of the Motor Vehicle Act after challenge to police evidence - NO CRIMINAL RECORD.
R. v. Z.W. [2011]
Charges of Impaired Driving and Over 80 resolved through negotiation with the prosecutor mid-trial as a result of delay between first and second trial date. Plea to driving without due care and attention under the Motor Vehicle Act - NO CRIMINAL RECORD.
R. v. V.Z. [2010]
Charges of Impaired Driving and Over 80 dropped due to defence position that case had been delayed too long by two Crown adjournments and client entitled to trial within a reasonable time.
R. v. J.P. [2010]
Client found Not Guilty after trial on charges of Impaired Driving and Driving "Over 80" as a result of challenge to police evidence regarding the timing of the breath samples. Judge held that breath samples were not taken "as soon as practicable" and charges dismissed.
R. v. T.L. [2010]
Crown adjournment application DENIED on morning of trial when police officer does not show up to give evidence - CHARGES DISMISSED.
R. v. I.C. [2010]
DUI charges resolved with plea to driving without due care and attention under the Motor Vehicle Act after challenge to police evidence and negotiations with prosecutor on morning of trial - NO CRIMINAL RECORD.
R. v. R.F. [2010]
Charges reduced to driving without due care after application launched alleging that client's right to be tried within a reasonable time had been breached. Other issues included the breath samples being outside the two-hour limit and considerable delay by the police officer at the roadside before transportation of the driver to the police station - NO CRIMINAL RECORD and NO DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. K.J. [2010]
Difficult case of Impaired Driving and Driving "Over 80" resolved with plea to charge of Dangerous Driving resulting in NO CRIMINAL RECORD - discharge granted
R. v. J.V. [2010]
Impaired Driving charges STAYED by Judge after Mr. Shapray brought application based on 28 month delay from first appearance to trial date. Judge ruled that right to trial within a reasonable time was violated and that only remedy was for a Judicial Stay of Proceedings - NO CRIMINAL RECORD AND NO DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. D.M. [2010]
Charge of Driving Over "80" reduced to plea under the Motor Vehicle Act after challenge to the police investigation leading to the taking of the breath sample. Issues raised regarding a breach of the client's Charter rights and a delay in the timing of the Breath Demand - NO CRIMINAL RECORD and NO DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. G.H. [2010]
DUI charges dismissed after trial after motion to exclude evidence on the basis that there was no lawful grounds for vehicle stop by the police. Client found NOT GUILTY at trial - NO CRIMINAL RECORD and NO DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. M.C. [2010]
Impaired Driving Charges reduced to Motor Vehicle Act offence in case involving one car accident and overturned vehicle. Issues raised with respect to the time of driving and lack of impaired symptoms - NO CRIMINAL RECORD.
R. v. S.G. [2010]
Impaired Driving and Over 80 charges reduced to plea under the Motor Vehicle Act after challenge to police evidence regarding the taking of the breath sample and the lack of symptoms of impairment - NO CRIMINAL RECORD.
R. v. L.M. [2010]
Impaired Driving charges reduced to plea under s. 144(1)(b) of the Motor Vehicle Act on morning of the trial. Client received fine - NO DRIVING PROHIBITION and NO CRIMINAL RECORD.
R. v. T.W. [2010]
Impaired driving and Over 80 charges withdrawn before trial date after discussions with the prosecutor. Issues raised concerning the evidence of impairment and unreasonable delays by the police office regarding the timing of the Breath Demand.
R. v. D.K. [2010]
DUI charges of impaired driving and Driving Over 80 reduced mid-trial to driving without due care and attention under the Motor Vehicle Act. Vigorous cross-examination of the lead investigator regarding changes in his evidence lead prosecutor to agree to disposition resulting in NO CRIMINAL RECORD and NO DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. B.T. [2010]
DUI charges withdrawn by prosecutor on morning of trial after challenge to police evidence regarding evidence of impairment and delay in the reading of the breath demand - NO CRIMINAL RECORD and NO DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. R.M. [2010]
Impaired Driving and Over 80 charges resolved with plea to Driving Without Due Care under the Motor Vehicle Act after challenge to police evidence regarding impairment and grounds for making breath demand - NO CRIMINAL RECORD.
R. v. S.A. [2010]
Charges of Impaired Driving and Over 80 withdrawn by the prosecutor 2 days before the trial after negotiations with Mr. Shapray and proposed challenge to the admissibility of police officer's evidence at trial - NO CRIMINAL RECORD and NO DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. M.M. [2010]
Charges of Impaired Driving and Dangerous Driving resolved with plea to Driving Without Due Care under the Motor Vehicle Act (s. 144) - NO CRIMINAL RECORD AND NO DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. E.M. [2010]
Charges of impaired driving and "over 80" reduced to driving without due care under the Motor Vehicle Act on the morning of trial after challenge to the police evidence - No Criminal Record.
R. v. R.S. [2010]
Charge of Refusal to Provide a Breath Sample - client found NOT GUILTY after trial after challenge to police evidence on the issue of whether she had actually made a clear and unequivocal refusal - NO CRIMINAL RECORD AND NO DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. T.B. [2010]
DUI charges reduced to Motor Vehicle Act charge after application to thrown our case for unreasonable delay - NO CRIMINAL RECORD AND NO DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. J.R. [2010]
Impaired driving charges reduced to s.144 of the Motor Vehicle Act after late disclosure of police notes on morning of second trial date leads to unreasonable delay - No Criminal Record.
R. v. R.P. [2009]
Client found NOT GUILTY after trial on charges of Impaired Driving and Over 80. Trial involved challenge to police evidence regarding unexplained delays before taking of breath samples and lack of impaired symptoms displayed by driver during the investigation - NO CRIMINAL RECORD AND NO DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. R.D. [2009]
Charges dropped on morning of trial after challenge to credibility of main Crown witness in case involving two car accident at resort town in the interior or B.C. Crown unable to prove identity of driver involved in the accident.
R. v. A.S. [2009]
DUI charge reduced to plea under the Motor Vehicle Act after challenge to quality of the prosecution evidence regarding impaired symptoms and driving evidence.
R. v. R.P. [2009]
Client found NOT GUILTY of Impaired Driving and Over 80 after trial. Delay issues in the taking of breath samples raised during cross-examination and evidence of impaired driving not proven beyond a reasonable doubt - NO CRIMINAL RECORD AND NO DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. R.S. [2009]
Impaired driving case involving accident - legal issues raised with prosecutor prior to trial resulting in Stay of Proceedings - NO CRIMINAL RECORD and NO DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. D.K. [2009]
Border Case - client found NOT GUILTY of charges of Impaired Driving and Over 80 after issues of delay in taking breath samples raised during trial.
R. v. G.B. [2009]
Client found NOT GUILTY of Impaired Driving and Over 80 after trial after issue of Identification not proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
R. v. M.S. [2009]
Charges of Impaired Driving and Refusal to Provide a Breath Sample dropped by prosecutor on eve of trial after submissions that the evidence in relation to care and control and the grounds for the breath demand were insufficient.
R. v. S.B. [2009]
Charges of Impaired Driving and Over 80 reduced to plea under s. 144 of the Motor Vehicle Act on morning of trial resulting in NO CRIMINAL RECORD.
R. v. M.F. [2009]
Charges of Impaired Driving and Over 80 DROPPED by prosecutor on morning of trial after witness issues develop and Crown unable to prove case.
R. v. J.S. [2009]
Charges of Impaired Driving and Over 80 dropped on morning of trial after legal issues raised with the prosecutor regarding the validity of the results of the BAC Datamaster breathalyzer machine.
R. v. G.M. [2009]
Charge of Driving Over 80 dismissed at trial.
R. v. J.M. [2009]
Challenge to evidence results in Crown dropping charges of Impaired Driving and Over 80 prior to trial - No Criminal Record and No Driving Prohibition.
R. v. J.K. [2009]
Charges of Impaired Driving and Over 80 dropped by prosecutor on morning of trial after issues surrounding police investigation raised by defence - Stay of Proceedings directed by Crown.
R. v. A.R. [2009]
Negotiations with prosecutor prior to trial result in Impaired Driving and Over 80 charges being reduced to plea to Driving without Due Care under s. 144(1)(b) of the Motor Vehicle Act - No Criminal Record - No Further Driving Prohibition.
R. v. E.K. [2009]
Charges of Impaired Driving and Over 80 withdrawn by prosecutor before commencement of trial as a result of witness availability issues and no Crown adjournment available.
R. v. K.C. [2009]
Delay issues raised prior to trial resulting in Impaired Driving charges being reduced to plea under Motor Vehicle Act - NO CRIMINAL RECORD.
R. v. C.V. [2009]
Impaired Driving and Over 80 charges dropped - issues regarding identification and fraudulent document created by police officer raised tainting entirety of evidence in the case - NO CRIMINAL RECORD and NO DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. K.C. [2009]
DUI charges reduced to a charge of driving without due care and attention under section 144 of the Motor Vehicle Act after issues raised regarding unacceptable delay and breach of client's constitutional rights - NO CRIMINAL RECORD.
R. v. G.S. [2009]
Impaired Driving charges DROPPED on morning of trial after delay issues arose due to lack of court time.
R. v. G.T. [2009]
Charge of driving over .08 charge reduced to s.144 under the Motor Vehicle Act mid-trial after vigorous challenge to police evidence and testimony of defence witness. Impaired driving charge also dropped after challenge to police evidence resulting in NO CRIMINAL RECORD and NO DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. K.M. [2009]
Charges dropped mid-trial as a result of defence application to quash the charges due to missing information - Crown directs Stay of Proceedings and client is free to go with NO CRIMINAL RECORD and NO DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. J.L. [2009]
Charges of Impaired Driving and Over "80" Dropped MID-TRIAL - NO CRIMINAL RECORD and NO DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. A.K. [2009]
DUI charges (Impaired and Over "80") resolved by way of plea to Driving Without Due Care and Attention pursuant to s. 144 of the Motor Vehicle Act resulting in No Criminal Record and No Driving Prohibition!
R. v. J.M. [2009]
DUI charges dropped mid-trial when issues concerning evidence led by the prosecutor were raised by Mr. Shapray resulting in NO CRIMINAL RECORD and NO DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. N.B. [2009]
Challenge to police evidence prior to trial leads to a plea under the Motor Vehicle Act resulting in No Criminal Record.
R. v. L.C. [2009]
Challenge to police evidence prior to trial leads to a plea under the Motor Vehicle Act resulting in No Criminal Record.
R. v. J.O. [2009]
Charges of Impaired Driving and resolved by plea to s. 144 of the Motor Vehicle Act as the Registered Owner resulting in No Criminal Record, No Driving Prohibition and NO POINTS!
R. v. J.D. [2009]
Charges of Impaired Driving and Over "80" resolved with plea under the Motor Vehicle Act resulting in NO CRIMINAL RECORD.
R. v. B.H. [2009]
DUI case involving truck in an accident and blood samples DROPPED PRIOR TO TRIAL after vigorous challenge to evidence and negotiations with trial prosecutor.
R. v. S.R. [2009]
Client found NOT GUILTY after trial on charges of Impaired Driving and Over "80".
R. v. N.B. [2008]
Prosecutor agrees to plea to s. 144 of the Motor Vehicle Act in middle of the trial after issues raised with evidence - NO CRIMINAL RECORD and NO DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. W.P [2008]
Client found NOT GUILTY after trial of charges of Impaired Driving and Over 80 after trial judge found violation of client's legal rights by investigating police officer.
R. v. T.K. [2008]
Charges of impaired driving and Over 80 dropped in favour of plea to drive without due care and attention under the Motor Vehicle Act resulting in NO CRIMINAL RECORD and NO DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. P.F. [2008]
Charges dropped prior to trial after challenge to police evidence.
R. v. Z.H. [2008]
DUI charges resolved with plea to Motor Vehicle Act offence prior to trial - NO CRIMINAL RECORD!
R. v. R.D. [2008]
Impaired Driving charges dropped on day of trial - No Criminal Record and No Driving Prohibition!
R. v. S.M. [2008]
Impaired Driving and charges of Over "80" in case involving accident DROPPED PRIOR TO TRIAL after challenge to police evidence and negotiation with prosecutor.
R. v. G.G.[2008]
Client found NOT GUILTY of charges of Impaired Driving and Refusing to Provide a Breath Sample after trial.
R. v. E.V. [2008]
Charges of impaired driving and Over 80 dropped for plea to Intoxicated in a Public Place resulting in NO CRIMINAL RECORD and NO DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. R.N. [2008]
Prosecutor forced to drop charges after successful challenge to crown adjournment application due to police officer being transferred to other part of the province.
R. v. J.L. [2008]
Client found NOT GUILTY after a trial when defence evidence called to show that blood alcohol readings would be under the legal limit at the time of driving.
R. v. N.B. [2008]
Challenge to police and civilian evidence at trial results in plea to s. 144 charge under the Motor Vehicle Act at end of case resulting in NO CRIMINAL RECORD and NO DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. N.G. [2008]
Challenge to police evidence leads to reduction of criminal charges to plea under the Motor Vehicle Act resulting in No Criminal Record and No Driving Prohibition.
R. v. E.L. [2008]
Charges of impaired driving and over 80 dismissed after trial.
R. v. G.K. [2008]
Client found NOT GUILTY of Impaired Driving and Over 80 charges after trial - police officer unable to produce required documents to prove blood alcohol level over the legal limit.
R. v. S.S. [2008]
Client found not guilty of impaired driving charges when prosecutor unable to produce evidence to prove that driver was in care and control of the motor vehicle.
R. v. D.M. [2008]
Impaired driving charges withdrawn on morning of trial after multiple challenges to police evidence including issues with the certificate showing the blood alcohol readings over the legal limit - NO CRIMINAL RECORD AND NO DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. D.L. [2008]
Charges of impaired driving and refusing to provide a breath sample reduced to Motor Vehicle Act offence after challenge to police evidence resulting in NO CRIMINAL RECORD.
R. v. D. S. [2007]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.
R. v. C.D. [2007]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence resulting in Crown not being able to prove care and control of vehicle.
R. v. R.A. [2007]
DUI charges dropped after application filed to throw out charges due to unreasonable delay.
R. v. R.B. [2007]
Charges of impaired driving withdrawn after challenge to police evidence regarding the identity of the accused.
R. v. T.S. [2007]
DUI charges reduced to Motor Vehicle Act offence after successful cross-examination of police officer on issues relating to the validity of criminal charges - NO CRIMINAL RECORD.
R. v. A.C. [2007]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.
R. v. N.R. [2007]
Charges of impaired driving and refusing to provide a breath sample reduced to Motor Vehicle Act offence after challenge to police evidence resulting in NO CRIMINAL RECORD
R. v. L.L. [2007]
Charges of impaired driving and over 80 reduced to Motor Vehicle Act offence after challenge to police evidence resulting in NO CRIMINAL RECORD.
R. v. R.C. [2007]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.
R. v. B.K. [2007]
Successful challenge to 90-day Administrative Driving Prohibition for over refuse breath sample charge.
R. v. G.K. [2007]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence including evidence of client's drinking pattern showing he would have been under the legal limit.
R. v. A.B. [2007]
Charges of impaired driving and refusing to provide a breath sample reduced to Motor Vehicle Act offence after challenge to police evidence resulting in NO CRIMINAL RECORD.
R. v. T.J. [2007]
Charges of impaired driving and over 80 reduced to Motor Vehicle Act offence after challenge to police evidence resulting in NO CRIMINAL RECORD.
R. v. R. M. [2006]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.
R. v. M.S. [2006]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence - client permitted to plead to lesser offence under the Motor Vehicle Act resulting in NO CRIMINAL RECORD and NO FURTHER DRIVING PROHIBITION.
R. v. E.M. [2006]
Charges of impaired driving and over .08 arising at U.S./Canada border crossing dropped before trial after issues with evidence of customs inspectors raised with prosecutor.
R. v. C.L. [2006]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.
R. v. S.W. [2006]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.
R. v. S.W. [2006]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.
R. v. S.K. [2006]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.
R. v. G. W. [2006]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.
R. v. G.W. [2006]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.
R. v. D.D. [2006]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.
R. v. J.F. [2006]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.
R. v. G.W. [2006]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.
R. v. L.W. [2006]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.
R. v. L.M. [2006]
Impaired driving charges reduced to Motor Vehicle Act offence after challenge to police investigation. No Driving Prohibition.
R. v. R.H. [2005]
Charges of impaired driving and over 80 withdrawn by prosecutor in middle of trial after strenuous cross-examination of primary police officer in the case.
R. v. G.S. [2005]
Charge of impaired driving and over 80 withdrawn after issues of police suppression of material evidence raised during trial.
R. v. D.P. [2005]
Charges of impaired driving and refuse breath sample dropped in the middle of trial after police officers caught talking about evidence outside the courtroom in breach of court order.
R. v. L.C. [2005]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.
R. v. L.R. [2005]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.
R. v. B.S. [2005]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.
R. v. R.R. [2005]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.
R. v. L. M. [2005]
Charge of impaired driving and over 80 withdrawn after successful challenge to police evidence.
R. v. P.D. [2005]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 dropped before trial after successful fight against Crown application to adjourn trial results in no witnesses being available for the prosecution.
R. v. S.G. [2005]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police investigative methods in case involving seizure of blood samples and hospital records to prove blood alcohol readings.
R. v. D.F. [2005]
Successful challenge to police evidence in impaired driving case resulting in plea to Motor Vehicle Act charge with No Criminal Record.
R. v. F.N. [2005]
Charges of impaired driving and driving over .08 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.
R. v. R.L. [2005]
Charge of impaired driving and over 80 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.
R. v. K.R. [2004]
Charge of impaired driving and over 80 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.
R. v. M. [2004]
Charge of impaired driving and over 80 withdrawn after challenge to police evidence.
R. v. K [2004]
Charge of impaired driving and over 80 withdrawn against client from the United States.
R. v. A. [2003]
Charge of impaired driving and over 80 withdrawn after challenge to the evidence.
R. v. E.M. [2003]
Charge of impaired driving and over 80 withdrawn against client from the United States.
R. v. V. [2003]
Charge of refuse to provide a breath sample stayed by the Crown. Impaired driving charge reduced to drive without due care and attention under the Highway Traffic Act resulting in no criminal record.
R. v. D.J. [2001]
Charges of impaired driving and Over 80, client acquitted after trial.
R. v. S.B. [2001]
Charges of impaired driving and refuse breath sample withdrawn after attack on evidence and challenge to the destruction of evidence.
